DUCATI TT and F1 FORUM
 
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 3:13 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:23 am
Posts: 1811
The pitfalls of putting two Horizontal (O) 900-based (SS, ST2, ie) cams in Pantah heads. I am going to come back and fill this in bit by bit. And try to make some past postings more clear. First the photos, before I lose them. Later, MikeV

The cam pulley for the V head using any reverse-head H cam, like a 900SS, is about 160 degrees off the stock Pantah V cam after it is installed on the cam with a key. If the original mark on that cam cog is used for belt installation that is a certain disaster. 160 degrees is eight notches on the cog, so as a Start Point that mark must be moved forward, as the cog turns counter-clockwise. Either count eight including the existing mark, or count seven more notches out from the original dot. Using that new mark, you should also see that the V intake valve is just a smidgen from full opening when the Horizontal (O) cam is at TDC --- one more notch turn and it will start to close very quickly. You can eye-test that looking thru the plug hole, and by flipping the head over on the bench to see it. Also, you can test the TDC mark by moving the pulley forward and back, and feel the resistance (and see) as each valves starts to lift — usually from two to three slots in either direction. Check out the Horizontal head to get an idea. You will be in the ballpark for degreeing the cams. It is better to do a first installation with no pistons, but if they are installed just don't try to overcome any resistance --- that means you are off, or you have some other clearance problem. After finding TDC for the V head you can add a mark on the head just below the front 6mm hole for the rubber belt cover. Once the V cam is that close then offset keys or adjustable cogs can be used for dialing the cams. The adjustable cogs are light, and pretty, and those dinky offset keys are not cheap or readily available. .

Anyway, that method worked on F1 heads on the LS clone with 900ss cams set at 109 degrees on center, and on a set of Pantah heads that Carlo put 35 & 41mm valves in. And now for two 900ie cams in the TT2, and two ST2 cams in the F1/TT1.

Now others can correct me. This has been done before by many. Whatever you do please be sure and confident about the opening and closing of the replacement H cam in place of a V, and that when the belts are installed both cam/valve actions mimic the original sequence.

Another PS: I think when Palmer said punching marks he means the dots and/or small slashes that the racers and NCR put on the heads to replace those removed if the rubber plates are not installed. They show up in all kinds of photos of the vintage bikes --- and Palmer's engines --- I guess. I punch a little dot, and use blue on the H head and red on the V head, and also mark the timing shaft cog the same way. Plus I mark the V head TDC on the latter.

The major advantage to using 900 cams over “old school” race cams is that they can be installed in Pantah heads with much smaller static valve-to-valve clearances. I will post some representative photos of both in another posting later in the week.

This was corrected/modified/embellished on Oct 24, 2023 from a prior posting.

An adjustable cam pulley (thanks Carlo) re-marked with a red dot for the installation of a 900-based Horizontal cam in the Pantah Vertical head.
Attachment:
IMG_1234.jpeg
IMG_1234.jpeg [ 1.09 MiB | Viewed 17266 times ]


This is TDC for a Vertical head; the new mark is found working from here.
Attachment:
IMG_1218.jpeg
IMG_1218.jpeg [ 1.04 MiB | Viewed 17273 times ]


The new mark used when installing belts, with the Horizontal head at TDC. Standard procedure once you have this marked.
Attachment:
IMG_1223.jpeg
IMG_1223.jpeg [ 1.12 MiB | Viewed 17273 times ]


Again, the new marking in red, with the original being the small hash mark at the bottom right (about 5 o’clock) on the pulley. Going clockwise it is now 200 degrees different (10 slots center-to-center), and going counter-clockwise 160 degrees different (8 slots).


Attachments:
IMG_1234.jpeg
IMG_1234.jpeg [ 1.09 MiB | Viewed 17274 times ]


Last edited by 618F1 on Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:47 am, edited 2 times in total.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:38 pm
Posts: 798
Thanks Mike, I am putting 900 ss cams in my pantah project, heads are shimmed so I can now compare mine to your photos.
Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2023 5:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:44 am
Posts: 1786
Images: 7
hi mike, I think you are doing a great job, I'm happy that my spare parts help you in this project


Top
 Profile Personal album  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 5:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:38 pm
Posts: 798
Mike, this may be a real dumb question….
Using adjustable pulleys wouldn’t it be just as simple to use the adjustment of the pulley to put you back to the stock timing mark rather that put other marks on the head?
Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 8:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:23 am
Posts: 1811
Aren’t they a long way off? Look at the key slot placement on stock Pantah-based cams. Lay them side-by-side. Very different between the H and the V. And now you are going to use two H cams. How can you use the pulleys without a new mark on one of them? The mark is either 160 or 200 degrees off (if you are AC or DC - lousy joke). What have I missed?

But this is what I had hoped for. Some discussion. Maybe a better way.

MikeV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:38 pm
Posts: 798
A couple of photos
First photo note the position of the key way and the timing mark.
Second 900ss cam
Third stock head and cam


Attachments:
IMG_2855.jpeg
IMG_2855.jpeg [ 2.84 MiB | Viewed 16837 times ]
IMG_2852.jpeg
IMG_2852.jpeg [ 2.92 MiB | Viewed 16837 times ]
IMG_2854.jpeg
IMG_2854.jpeg [ 3.08 MiB | Viewed 16837 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:38 pm
Posts: 798
Too bad we are so far apart!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 1:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:23 am
Posts: 1811
Yes, it is. A bird in the hand…….

The photos do not clear things up for me. Are these all stock setups? Or is one of them a Pantah head with a 900 cam in it? If not, the proof will come when you do that.

I think the problem is that the keyways on all H/V cam sets are in different places, and you cannot simply move an H cam to the V position and expect it to work. Even using two Pantah H cams causes the same kind of problem. Otherwise, why are they marked with an O and a V? Does it matter?

MikeV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 2:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:23 am
Posts: 1811
Paul.

If the head (1985) with the adjustable pulley is on a 900 cam in a Pantah head did you pull that cog apart and spin the outside around for a new alignment mark? I am puzzled. You may have been lucky, but what about pulleys with only three bolts, or with none?

Have I made the simple complicated?

MikeV


Last edited by 618F1 on Wed Nov 22, 2023 1:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Installing 900-based cams in Pantah-era heads
PostPosted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:38 pm
Posts: 798
Mike,
Yes that is what I did, the last photo is a pantah cam and a vertical head for reference to show intake valve position when the mark on the pulley linesvwith the dot on the rubber shroud.
The middle picture is a 900 cam with the pulley taken apart then rotated to approximately the same place to be verified when checking cam timing.
Hope that makes sense now?
Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Template made by DEVPPL
[ Time : 0.232s | 15 Queries | GZIP : Off ]